Based on my readings and understanding that continuous improvement is thinking about what we do and seeking ways to do it even better. I attended our school board meeting last Monday looking for evidence of continuous improvement. I noticed the following at the board meeting:
1.
The
superintendent asked for input from administrators during meetings when the
information pertaining to something they were involved in
or produced.
2.
Building
reports were used to celebrate successes
3.
Reports
from committees on ways to improve.
4.
Data
was presented by the director of instruction on assessment scores.
Things that were not noticed or could be different:
1.
Further
discussion on the assessment data presented could have been
beneficial. As superintendent, I would have led further discussion with
the board, focused on what we have in place and what we are planning to
continue to affect the scores that were presented. This would give us a chance
to get feedback from the board.
2.
There
was no feedback on initiatives. With us currently going through so many
initiatives from RTI, PBIS, educator effectiveness, etc. I think there needs to
be some open dialogue with the school board about where we are
with initiatives. This would provide transparent evidence of what work is
being done by administration and what work were asking our staffs to do. This
also will give viable information to help them make decisions.
3.
There
is very little input or participation from the community. As superintendent, I
would implement "listening" sessions. These would be
30 to 45 minute discussions held prior to the formal board meeting. The agenda
would have a particular topic of budget, staffing, facilities, or anything that
is part of the district strategic plan. However, the sessions could branch out
into anything that the community would like to discuss with the board. These
discussions would help to connect to the community and inform the
board of education what the communities interests are when
making decisions.
I'm a firm believer that good decisions depend on good
information. It is the superintendent’s job as the leader of the school board
to make sure they have the best information. A superintendent may need
to ask school board what data they need and in what format to hope
them the more efficient and effective.
In your second point above you indicate that there was little feedback considering the many initiatives that your district is implementing. I would question as to their level of involvement prior to the initiatives. Perhaps the training needs to be in involvement and not in initiatives, and same with the community. A listening session may not be successful if the participants are not comfortable having a conversation.
ReplyDelete